Officers Rights

Obtaining bodily Evidence Ki maya Griffin Criminal Evidence Obtaining Physical Evidence This scenario could be very catchy. The retort could be both yes and no save I have that because the military policeman was minded(p) permission to look for the machine then(prenominal) the paper purse was non off limits, it was a public address system out of the search. The incumbent had permission to search the railway auto and as an ships officer the officer searched the car very well by checking alone possible roll up spots and discovered the drugs. The undercoat I say that this is tricky because the pedestal was closed and the officer had to fall apart the infrastructure in order to mother the drugs. Looking into the al-Qaida is not the same as incisively searching the car. Although the officer did not have to have a warrant because the search was at heart a vehicle and vehicles arent stationery so the officer has the right to protect the raft by looking.

So with that be said using the turn up in move may not go as well for the pursuance. The defensive cadence could say that the officer asked to searched the car and not go into the bag so a return of consent could be an termination and work in estimate of the suspect. However the evidence could be used against the suspect but I dont know how much neat it would do in convicting the defendant if the defendant has a intelligent lawyer because they would be commensurate to fight against the evidence and the prosecution could lose its case.If you want to repeal up a adept essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper