Congestion Charging Essay

Resolving capital of the United Kingdoms transport problems was the highest priority of the city manager of capital of the United Kingdom, Ken Livingstone. His goal was to create a world-class transport governance that would improve business might, supports greater economic prosperity and improves the quality of bearing for every one living in London or visit London.The Mayors transport strategy, which was published on 10 July 2001, it had ex key priorities* Reducing handicraft over-crowding* Rising money for electrical resistance investment* Rising money for radical improvements to bus services crossways London* Better consolidation of the National Rail system with Londons early(a) transport systems* Increasing the capacity of Londons transport system* Improving trip time reliability for cable car users* Supporting local transport initiatives* Making the distribution of goods and services in London much reliable and efficient* Improving the accessibility of Londons trans port system* Bringing forward new integration initiatives.What is Congestion Charges?* Congestion charging is a way of ensuring that those using valuable and move road space make a financial contribution.* It encourages the use of otherwise modes of transport and is also intended to ensure that, for those who have to use the roads, journey times are quicker and more reliable.* This scheme requires drivers to stomach 5 per day if they wish to continue driving in central London. electron tube stationWide line zone ring road wad Cam key out what the traffic is likeCharging zone areaParking germinate stationRiver servicesThis map shows all the areas that are affected by congestion charges. By looking at the map you plunder see all of central London zone 1 and zone 2 has being affected, so anyone living within that area would have to abide the congestion charge to travel to their local area or foreign the congestion zones.Advantage and disadvantage of congestion chargingAdvanta ge* Reduce congestion* Reduce through traffic* Further encourage use of domain transport in central London* Benefit business efficiency by speeding up the movement of goods and people* Create a better environment for walking and cyclingDisadvantageo avocation may increase on orbital routes by up to 5%o Traffic would be reduced on radial routes by 5 10%o Overall reduction in traffic by 1 2%o London scheme could patently make traffic worse elsewhereo Will touch on disadvantaged hardesto The scheme had no pilot scheme to turn out the effectiveness of congestion chargeso It will take months to establish whether it is a successConclusionCongetion charges has it adavantages and disavantages an asthmatic would would totally spport congestion charges, as contamination caused by cars is a factor of asthame. It is also a class question. Those who can afford to have moved, those who cant have to stay and choke. If congestion charges give them and thier families a chance to breathe then I would richly support it.However, they need to be part of a plan aimed at enhancing the environment and improving the quality of life. This could include cheaper public transport and improvements in its quality, safety and reliability more nurseries and play schools nearer to where people live, more on-line shopping, local markets and food co-ops, reduced hours with no loss of pay repopulating city centres and the countryside, more home working and home schooling a guaranteed income to give parents the option of being full time carers polish offering those unbidden to give up their car free bikes or public transport. entirely there is also an agrument about Who is prepared to pay 10 a day, 50 a week, or 3,500 a year for congestion charging and 2,000 for piece of work parkingwhich is 6,000 of taxed incomefor the privilege of bringing their car into London? It is the riche man ie stockborker, banker, law ect who wants to come in from Surbiton to the City of London. Their would no t wit the charges. thier nonpluss them down to they companies and it pays the 5,000 or 10,000 a year. Who cares anyway? He will honest say, Thats great, thank you very much. I believe It is a flump cats charter.What about people on a low wage, over-the-hill people, small mothers who are dependent on their motor car not hardly in London but throughout the nation? To those people, 5,000 or 10,000 a year is a lot. What I want to know is this. What consultations has the Labour company had with groups of disabled people? What consultations has it had with the unions in regard to low wage earners? What consultations has it had with old peoplepeople who need their motor cars, and who will be taxed off the road if the charges are to work? If the Government say that is not their intention, and that such people will not be taxed off the road, I put it to them that there is no chance that their congestion charge will work.It is certain(a) that the fat cats will not be taxed off the ro ad. If the Government chance on a way of allowing housewives, young mothers, disabled people or members of the other categories to stay on the road, the amount of congestion will not be reduced, and all that we shall have is a revenue raiser for the mayor.