The Shrm Can Support The Competitiveness Management Essay

The Shrm Can Support The scrap charge EssayIn 20th century, orbiculateization as a set of belief or ideologies becomes infectious. An ideologies -concerned primary with maximization economicals that pull prominence to the mappings of grocery store forces along with the deregulation and privatization would lead the go along economic growth, it defines as the bear upon has speeded up dramatic altogethery in the last twain decade as technological advance make it easier for raft for people travel communicate and do duty worldwideity. (Investor word, 2005) The publicize gene arrange virtually change to the world, counterbalance, The world(a)ization has is accession the matched rivalry from the domestic to the global, as oer past 25 year the number of MNC(multinational Company) has increase eight fold and the foreign direct investment stock has increase xii fold. The economic indicator reflects the reshuffling of the total work investment aside from domestic to foreig n largely by merger and acquisition (Cooke, 2005, p.283). Second, the fast be increasingly seek to leverage the HRM to compete in global grocery store, academic and practitioner a the like has increasingly to explore transnational possible of SHRM (Bratton and Gold, 2007).Therefore, HR today is filling a lead intent along with business do work in creating necessary momentum and infixed might. This is rivalry by the elections realized theory of (Barney, 1991) it hold that as a fast(a) resources argon key determinant of its hawkish reward. The resources mustiness be creating say to be and competitor backbreaking to observe.(Refer appendix A) A case of related to the resources and competence, it shown that the capability for the competitory return requires Core competence and unique resources. It call resource has 4 type, physical, financial, adult male resources, and intellectual metropolis and define the core competence as the ability of prudence to de ploy their resources goodly which deposenot be imitate by competitor. (Johnson, Scholes, Whittington, 2008). In order to manage employee for warring favor benignant resource heed must possess competence relevant for effective tooling SHRM exertion (Barney Wright, 1988). Is that so gentleman resources policies and practices may be an oddly authorised sources of sustaining the private-enterprise(a) advantage (Jackson Schuler,1995).The Emergent SHRM out decipherFrom the introduction, we already explain HRM rouse be identify as a tool to sustain agonistical advantage further, how to it sustain the competitoryness, it outhouse be explain by the Strategy gracious resource prudence, it is a process of linking the tender resources function with the strategical objective of the make-up in order to remedy per plaster castance (Bratton and Gold, 2007). Snell et al (1996, p.62) defined it as an consequent as brass design to call on all everywhere sustainable r ivalrous advantage through with(predicate) people .The growing invade in SHRM has convey primarily be engender galore(postnominal) of the traditional sources of competitive dodge have been rely on, much(prenominal) as patent, economic of scale, access to capital and market expansion are being eroded by the market establish competition (Nolan, 2002). Is that so, the human race resources nuzzlees, how to recruit, sustain, strike and integrate the module toward the judicature objective and how it adopt change environs has become an authorized issue on generating the competitive advantage of the companionship.It has been plead by the knob (1997) mildew of HRM (refer Appendix B), at that place is a faithful link between HR outline and general business outline, Cost lead, Focus, Cost reduction, through lend oneself the suitable Human resources practise, which may supply the HRM outcome, consignment, Quality, And Flexibility to the staff, and he study after achie ving the following policy goal, superior per imprintance outcome go out be depictd (Bratton Gold, 2007).Harvard model (Beer et al,1984) also argue that the Human resources practise must keep in view on the stakeholder and business environment concerns, and contact the employee Commitment, competence, congruence and woo effectiveness, which may generate the long term consequences matter , individual result being afford, organization effectiveness.There are 2 approaches on articulateing the human resources outline.Best pass a flair approach, which argue that HR schema leave be more proficient when it is integrated mightily with its specific organization and environment contract (Boxall Purcell, 2000), Baird and Meshoulam (1988) argue that the HR practise must fit the organization stage of knowledge they describe as away fit or vertical fit. However, the most signifi angle go around-fit model has been one in which external fit is determined by the organizations compet itive scheme, rather than its stage of development (Boxall and Purcell, 2000).Best practise approach, which is base on the belief that is a set of superior human resources practices which, If adopted will lead better organization (). Definitions of best practice are of all time drawn from research on the quad preferred sub functions of undergrad personnel psychology selection, training, appraisal and pay (Boxall and Purcell, 2000).This meat the Human resources strategy must involve the whole management structure or process, kind of on bonny HR approachesIdeal Types Human resource strategyBamberger and Meshoulam (2000), integrate the two main models of HR strategy, one is approaches straining on the strategys underlying logic of Managerial control, the different one centreing on reward -effort exchange, arguing that neither of the two dichotomous approaches (Control and resources based) provide a framework able to encompass the ebb and flow of the intensity and perpetratio n of HR strategy. (refer Appendix C)The implication of globalization in Tourism perseverance, and the bureau of SHRM in Sustainable touristry development.As globalization also way of life increase in international division of roil, achieve through the international fragmentation of production as well as the political manner toward a more liberal economic order (Vesna,1999). legion(predicate) beau monde going to global, as company can gain competitive advantages by focusing on marketing and distributing while turning to foreign manufacturer for manufacturing of their product. (Bourgeois et al ,1999). Tourism industries are not an exception, touristry is a phenomena base on travel pattern of people, technology and cultural value is a major vehicle or operative in effecting globalization process. (E,Wanda,Georges, 2002). But it face some(prenominal) challenge as development of foreign expanse may affect the local community and local business, Clark and Arbel (1993) cite sev eral(prenominal) challenge such as communication difficulty, little control over regulatory legal, political finale ,political instability, different labour pattern woo ,product supplier ,religion custom work ,ethnic, language ,lack of code and standard. Rapid growths of tourism possess a threat to environment social and international relation. (Klancnik, 2003). Many of the NGO has aware of this issue, so they come out with global tourism development theory, Sustainable tourism development.UNWTO (2012) define it as tourism that take full account of its current and future economic, social and environment impact, addressing the compulsion of visitor, the industry, the environment and the host community. UNEP and UNWTO (2005) encourage all plain make confident(predicate) their policy and action for its development and management fully embrace the article of faith of sustainability.Government also play an beta single-valued function on it, it has many tools that can work for ma ke a different such as the energy to make regulation and offer economic incentive and the resources and unveiling to upraise decimate goal practise. (UNEP UNWTO, 2005). Furthermore, The sustainable tourism is not just focus on the environment conservation issue, UNEP UNWTO (2005) define that are 3 element, economic sustainability, social sustainability, economic sustainability, where social sustainability is focus on respecting human right and commensurate prospect recognizes and respecting different cultural and avoiding any form of exploitation. Therefore ,the global policy like human right, fairness in the work environment are become vital issue that organization occupy to pay attention, in the other hand David Ulrich and Brockbank (2005) argue that the constituent of employee champion in SHRM, we has to see the word through employee eye and all of their representation while the same time looking customer, shareholder and managing director eye and communicate to employ ee what is require for through them to be success and creating value. Guest also argue that High employee commitment as a faultfinding HR outcome, concern with the goals of binding employees to the organization and obtaining the behavioural outcome increase effort, cooperation and organization citizenship.(Bratton Gold, 2007) This shown that sustainable development require coordination of SHRM.In national takeIn 1995, international labour market conference state that tourism industry facing or acute shortage of skilled custody and there are many obstacles as far as HR resources in tourism industry (Srivastave, 2008).In Malaysia, Ministry of Tourism and Ministry of Human resource are in charge of sustainable tourism development , where MOTOUR focusing on eco-tourism and ensuring the quality and sustainability product (NEAC, 2011), MOHR in charge of social sustainability where they promote equal fortune in work place (MOHR, 2001).Tourism industry is the important contributor to E conomy which generating RM 360 Billion in GNI (ETP, 2010). The government face a lot of difficulty when implementing the sustainable tourism development. First, the constrains on man power shortage of training opportunity and in comely opportunity to learn and the prise the specific emergency for tourist (NEAC, 2011). Second ,high turnover, Globally the turnover rate is estimated range 60-300% annually which is far away than the 34.7% annual turn overrate in manufacturing industry.(Walker Miller, 2010).Third, the replacement of foreign worker and the confusing of Y coevals to enter the industry, a stick with of MOHR show that the gap for hotel are e particularly for worker in food and beverage segment front line as well as housekeeping staff are change with foreign worker, (ETP, 2010) local graduate from Bachelors of degree in hotel management merely guarantee the attainment of management position ,and some more they need to compete with the local SPM low skill labour, this i s different from other country. This seat has demotivate the local employee to enter the industry as Pendergast (2009) state that mentoring model that focus on individual development use the time span of 5 year shell outer supply are one of the suggest strategy in Y generation value and motivator. Fourth low salary, reasonable salary for tourism industry is RM 1084 per month, which is relative lower compare with other large industry in Malaysia (ETP, 2010), in result the local direct to enter the hospitality industry enticed by income prospect in market such as Singapore Macau or Hong Kong. (ETP, 2010).From the analyst above, I give out a hypothesis, how to enhance the sustainable tourism planning and sustain the competitive advantage of the Tourism and Hospitality industry, it fall back to, how the company or country adopt the Strategy human resource management by implement best human resources practises.The human resources practisesRecruitment and selection, is a process wher e the organization attract and selected the right staff to the organization, an effective approach of enlisting and selection can help organization increase the competitive advantage by choosing the best pool of candidate quickly and be efficiency. (Kleiman, 2005).Training and development, in SHRM it is not just a process to develop the skill capability of the staff, but also provide schooling environment and the employee own career and future development. There is a growing ferocity on viewing organization as a total acquisition system and finding its core competence which reveal its collective learning (Prahalad Hamel, 1990).Performance appraisal, it is a process to measuring and evaluate the act and component part of the staff, Tznier, et. al., (2000) suggest that organizations generally use performance appraisal for two full(a) designs. First performance appraisals are used in administrative decisions such as progresss, salary allocations, and assignments. And second, performance appraisals are used as a tool for employee development processes such as offering feedback, critiquing performance, and setting goals for improvement. telling human resources development may enhance the company competitive advantages.Employee sake and relations are the complex set of human resources practices and organization socialization that seek to secure commitment and compliance with organization goals and standard through effective communications employee involvement, employee right and music directorial disciplinary action (Bratton Gold, 2007).Reward, it is the process to recognize the contribution of the staff, proper reward strategy may motivate and retain the employee, eventually enhance the performance of the employee to the organization. Motivation is an important HRM function to join and stay talented worker and performance better and do extra to the organization, is one of the most important part for organization to focus on develop and sustaining co mpetitive advantage.(Ahmad Khalaf, 2009).How company adopt SHRM by implement human resources practise are shown below.In tourism IndustryThe recruitment and selection play an important role on an organization, especially in the human based tourism and hospitality industry, and it place an important role on SHRM strategy planning as well as the best practise and best fit approaches, as employee replacement cost are high, make finding the right person to an organization imperative form two cultural and financial standpoint (Credit union charge, 2012). Therefore it is important for an organization to take full attention in the need of generate interest to employee apply the job, and the people who apply are capable to fulfilling the role in the employment (Bratton and Gold, 2007), as bad hiring practise can infract your business (Lawson, 2012). evidence are shown in the tourism industry Malaysia, depleted travel agency in Malaysia didnt provide the proper job specification, and br for each one on applying the best practise on Recruitment and selection policy, from the degree above, their employee are feel threatened by the entry of low capability foreigner worker, low salary, and no clear career pathway provided, thereof they are unwillingness to enter the local market, in result cause high turn-over, lack of professionalism, High turn-over rate may lead to corroding of the company implicit acquaintance base (Coff, 1997) affect company competitive advantage. (Delery Dotty, 1996). Unlike the Tourism Industry in US, Walt Disney, their SHRM practice chase after Commitment HRM strategy Bamberger and Meshoulam (2000) they not just provide piquant salary, they also care about the employee future career, until they retired .The salary provided is negotiable based on where employee stay, they interject save for 2 morrow programmes to secure when retired employee, they provide more than 10,000 online reference materials and resources, instructor-led classes, performance support systems, and education reimbursement for job-related degree programs to develop employee future, the reward are based on performance recognize employee contribution, (Disney, 2012), the purpose of organization is to generate a innovated and creative learning culture of the organization which the employee may share the acknowledgeledge in run intoing (Bratton Gold, 2007), it may enhance the organization competitive advantage ,as knowledge is intangible and difficult to imitate, Grant (1996) suggested that knowledge is the significant competitive asset that the firms possess . Barney (1991) also argue that it hold that as a firm resources are key determinant of its competitive advantage, and the resources must be creating value and competitor difficult to imitate.In Airlines,Multinational company Air-Asia pursue commitment HR strategy with locus control by outcome of the staff and focus on the inbred development of the staff(Bamberger Meshoulam, 2000) to supp ort its no frills strategy ,although it average salary is low for the reason of cost circumlocution , but the staff may be retained , whereby it conduct pilot project training programme for the Cabin crew to train as the first class officer (AirAsia, 2006), it set up an one stop Airasia honorary society to train the multitask staff(AirAsia, 2006), it promote knowledge environment , and everyone is in the same tiptop regardless of your position , they adopt fresh new ideas (Airasia, 2012).it promote, The Next genesis Leaders programme looking for intelligent, young professionals, who lead active lifestyles and who breathes rut into all endeavours (Airasia, 2012). it provide performances related bonus ,recognize the contribution of the staff, and it provide work-life balance, where the staff only need to work 5 days a week (Airasia, 2012), as result commitment, quality and flexible staff may improve the productivity of the organization, and which fix the leanest cost structure bu siness level strategy of Air-Asia (Airasia, 2012b), it has been prove by Guest (1989,1997), only when a coherent strategy directed toward the 4 policy goals fully integrated into business strategy and fully sponsored by the line management at all level is applied will high productivity and related outcomes sought by industry be achieved (1990, p.378).There is why now Air-Asia develop so quick and can become a leader of Low cost attack aircraft carrier Airline in the world .In Food and beverage industry foul upry brown in Malaysia make use of traditional SHRM strategy as it mission was to improve the standard growth of the organization and maximize the sale and profit through its structured franchise system. (Marrybrown,2007a),The training they provide are focus on service quality, improve productivity (Marrybrown, 2007b),in India they fly the coop to recruit external staff to maintain their service quality, the minimum requirement for a customer service crew is diploma, by using the attractive based salary and benefit reward examples, meals allowance, to attract and retain employee(Marybrown, 2012), in control system, the franchisor will make a regular visit on business review, market development and general business coordination (Marry brown 2007b).The purpose of this strategy was aim to process based control , in which close monitoring by supervisor and efficiency wages ensure adequate work effort. (MacDuffie, 1995).The traditional HR strategy or Best fit strategy has enhance the company growth rapidly, Marrybrown is now the largest home-grown QSR chain with over 300 restaurants in Malaysia, Azerbaijan, China, Bahrain, India, Indonesia, Iran, Kuwait, Maldives, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Syria, Tanzania and the United Arab Emirate(Zazali Musa, 2012).Macdonald make use of resourced based model HRM strategy to sustain it mission customers favourite place and way to eat, which focus on 5 area, product prices, place people and promotion .(Macdonald, 2012a ). The Manager had seen Human resources as an asset rather than a cost (Bratton Gold, 2007). In recruitment and selection process, the company make use of Macdonald kelvin Select, which consist of proven psychological profiling and behavioural assessment , which is Myes Briggs type indicator, Emotional intelligence prevue and the work personal index, aim to meet the candidate with enough competence to fix organization objective. (Mcdonald Green Human Resources, 2010), in employee involvement and relation, it promote manager mobility programme where the manager has the opportunity to work in any outlet of the world .(Mcdonald, 2012), Lashley(1994) commence with a survey of various claims made for employee empowerment as a means of winning commitment of frontline staff to delight customer with excellent and accordingly maximizing the profit of the business. In training and development the company promote lifelong learning , where the employee may has the opportunity to join the le adership programme, even-though has the opportunity to train in Hamburger university to enhance their career development, in the internal development programme mentoring are provided, program incorporates the latest technology features of both informal and formal mentoring approaches, providing a virtual environment to encourage race Engagements. (Mcdonald, 2012), Payne and Huffman (2005) suggest that mentoring can enhance positive commitment and reduce labour turnover. in result the afford of SHRM approaches has winning benefit the company on reaching their business objective. According to the report, 20 % of the franchiser is start as a crew, 70 % of the work proud to work at the company (Hand, 2008).From the expatiate above, we may aware, different industry and different organization may use different SHRM practise, and it is varies on their business objective, like Airasia, because of the no fills strategy, the company remove to pursue the commitment strategy to improve prod uctivity and reduce turn over, Walt Disney tend to achieve their innovative and creative business objective develop immitigable competitive advantage, so its focus on knowledge management, all of them has successful develop their own competitive advantages, so it prove that , my hypothesis is correct, where the SHRM play an important role in sustain the company competitive advantage , and sustainable tourism development, as they care of employee future development.The limitation of SHRMSince we know the SHRM can enhance and sustain the company competitive advantages but it meets some limitation, first lack of findation of Culture in global market. As strategic international human resource management has increasingly consider a key differencing factor between loser and winner in the Multinational Company (MNC) since 1990. (Schuler et al , 1993). strategical international human resources management is a step further than SHRM, recognize that is a need to particularise HRM across co untry culture ,an area there is increasingly being recognize as a course of business success or failure (Deresky,2008).Second, the SHRM may focus on the competitive strategy implementing, sack the internal development, example like Traditional HR strategy may be adopted by management when there is certainty over how inputs are transformed into outcomes and/or when employee performance can be nearly monitored or appraised(Bamberger Meshoulam, 2000), it is argue that at contingency analysis relies on external marketing strategy , and disregard the internal operation strategy that mould HR practise and performance. (Purcell, 1999).Third ,lack of HR expertise, David Ulrich (2005a) the HR guru once argue there are key role require in HR, business partnership, administrative expert, change agents , employee champion. According to the CIPD HR survey report (2003), among 1200 HR survey respondent, third of practitioners see their primary role as business partner ,slight fewer see themse lves as change agent, 4 per cent seen them as the administrative expert, finally is the employee champion. this situation may pollute the SHRM strength on sustain the competitive advantage, as the employee champion seen to take duty assignment one of the central nostrums of normative models of HRM, that employee well-being and organization goal can always be align (Tyson, 1995).Fourth the optimistic of HR manager, we cant avoid that that is a potential due to the personnel role of the decision maker, may affect the effectively of the SHRM strategy implementation. it is argue by Legge (1978) identify 2 strategy , the conformist innovator and the deviant innovator, the conformist manager attempts to fulfil the requirement of the senior management , the deviant innovator convey to a quit different set of norms, gaining credibility ,and support the ideas dictated by social value rather than strict economic criteria (Marchington Wilkinson, 2005). expiryAlthough there are some limitat ion, but I conclude that, the SHRM unsounded remain as the important tools for generating the competitive advantage , as we may aware ,that the traditional competitive strategy by Porter(1980) cost leadership , differentiation , and Focus has become common and being eroded by the competitive market(Nolan, 2002), and the unique characteristic of SHRM are effectively for sustaining the competitive advantage nowadays, it can be explain by the resources based approach (Appendix D) , where there are 4 element to sustain competitive advantage, rare, value, inimitability, non-substitutability.The human resources can create value to the organization , where specific skill and capability each employee held will provide more and less value depend on the market in which the organization operate (Johnson,2009).The human resources can be rare, like the management style, the leadership and close relationship, and the unique human resources practice. An organization that employed people with high er cognitive ability compared to their competitor will be more likely to gain competitive advantage through their rare resources (Wright et al, 1994).The human resource can be immitigability, and non-substitutability, example like the knowledge and the know-how skill develop, the competitor may find difficult to imitate. Amit and Shoesmake (1993) furiousness the strategic important of managers identify, ex ante and marshalling a set of complementary color and specialized resources and capability which are scare, durable, not easily trade and difficult to imitate.Furthermore I suggest, if a company are tend to chicken out the global market, they should more concern about the international strategic human resources management , when implementing the human resources practise, as culture and the legal perspective of country may be varies. Schuler et al (1993) once argue that, there four component we has to consider when apply the SIHRM, the exogenous factor, the endogenous factors S IHRM practices, the goals of the multinational company, the exogenous are related to the industry and the domestic characteristic (culture ), the endogenous is regarding the MNC internal own capability and culture, SIHRM issue, is regarding the issue of tendency of coordination, local or global responsiveness, and the goal of the MNC is regarding the profitability and the shareholder interest, as last I reemphasis, the SHRM is the indwelling tools for sustain the competitive advantage, therefore the manager must integrating the SHRM on the business level or corporate level strategy planning as we has proved that SHRM are the driver for the sustainable and developing of the competitive advantage.ReferencingAhmand, A. R., Khalaf, T. (2009) Achieve competitive advantage through job motivator, Accounting and worry Department, 20(2), pp.105-107.AirAsia. (2006) Airasia Annual report 2006. Malaysia. procurable at https//www.airasia.com/iwov-resources/my/common/pdf/AirAsia/IR/AA%20Corpor ate%2006.pdf (Accessed 19 April 2012).Airasia. (2012) We are Hiring. Malaysia. Available at http//www.airasia.com/my/en/corporate/careers_10reasons.page (Accessed 20 April 2012).Airasia. (2012b) Investor Relations. Malaysia. Available at http//www.airasia.com/my/en/corporate/irstrategy.page (Accessed 20 April 2012).Amit, R., Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) Strategic assets and organization rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp33-46.Baird, L., Meshoulam, I. (1988) Managing two fit of strategic human resource management, faculty member of Management Review, 13(1), pp.116-128Bamberger, P., Meshoulam I. (2000) Human resource Management Strategy. CA Sage.Barney, J. B. (1991) Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.Barney, J. B., Wright, P. M. (1988) On becoming a strategic partner the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage, Human Resources Management, 37(1), pp. 31-46.Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P. R., Quin, M. D., Walton, R. E. (1984). Managing Human Asset. New York bring out Press.Bourgeois, L. J., Duhaime, I. M., Stimpert, J. L. (1999) A Managerial Perspective 2nd. Fort Worth The Dryden Press.Boxall, P., Purcell, J. (2000) Strategic human resources management where have we go from where we are going, outside(a) Journal of Management Review, 2(2), pp. 183-203. Online. Available at (Accessed 20 April 2012).Bratton, J., Gold, J. (2007) Human resources management. London Palgrave Macmillan.CIPD HR survey report (2003) Where we are, where we are heading Online. Available at (Accessed22 April 2012).Coff, R. W. (1997) Human resources assets and management dilemmas coping with hazards on the road to resources based theory, Academy of Management Review, 22, pp. 374-402.Cooke, W. N. (2005) Exiting power in a prisoners dilemma transnational collective talk terms in an era of corporate globalization, Industry Relation Journal, 36(4), pp. 283-302.Delery, J. E., Dotty, D. H. (1996) Modes of theo rizing in strategic human resources management test of universalistic , contingency, and configurationally performances predictions, Academic of management Journal, 39, pp. 802-835.Deresky, H. (2008) International Management. New Jersey Person education Inc.E. Wanda George. (2002) Tourism, globalization and sustainable development Are these contravening concepts. Canada Lifestyle Information Network . Available at http//lin.ca/Uploads/cclr10/CCLR10-34.pdf (Accessed 15 Mar 2012).Economic Transformation Programmes . (2010) Revving up the tourism industry. Malaysia Performance Management Delivery Unit . Available at http//etp.pemandu.gov.my/upload/etp_handbook_chapter_10_tourism.pdf (Accessed 19 Mar 2012).Grant, R.M. (1996) Toward a knowledge based theory of firms, Strategic Management Journal, 17( special Issue), pp. 109-122.Guest, D. E. (1987) Human resources management and industry relations, Journal of Management Studies,24(5), pp.503-521.Guest, D. E. (1990) Human resources mana gement and American dreams , Journal of Management Studies,27(4), pp.377-397.Guest, D. E. (1997) Human resources management and performance a review and research agenda, International Journal of Human Resources Management, 8(3), pp.263-276.Hand, J. (2008) Everything I required to know I learned in McDonalds. Available at http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7213118.stm (Accessed 26 April 2012).Investor Word. (2005) Globalization. Available at http//www.investorwords.com/2182/globalization.html (Accessed 13 Mar 2012).Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S. (1995) Strategic human resources management. Blackwell Science.Johnson, G., Scholes, K., Wittington, R. (2008) .Exploring corporate strategy. 8th edn. London Pearson Educated Ltd.Johnson, R. (2009) Strategic international human resources management toward achieve sustained competitive advantage, Otago Management grade Review, 7, pp.63-79.Klanchik, V. R. (2003) Globalizacija turizama Eu- nova priloznost za slovenski turizen. Maribor 6 Slovens ki turisticni forum.Kleiman, L. S. (2005) Human resources management a Managerial Tool for competitive advantage. New Delhi Biztantra.Lawson, S. (2012) B