The Unjust Execution Of Socrates :: essays research papers

The Unjust Execution of SocratesIn the vortex of life, many evils retain transpired. Vices such as plagues,unforeseen deaths, and corruptness. Among the tragical acts of malefic proportionwas the death of the Greek philosopher, Socrates. He tried to lift andinvalidate many theories through reasoning, and he was murdered for his beliefs.His execution was non justified because the recoils that were brought againsthim were false and unfounded.The fist crime that Socrates was charged with was that of impiety. Thischarge was invented in the beginning to discredit him and make him unpopular with thecitizens. The charge was that of not ack straightawayledging the same gods that the claimbelieved in. Throughout the book, Socrates refers numerous times to the eventthat it is because of the gods that things be as they be to be. "Do yousuggest that I do not believe that the sunshine and moon are gods, as is the generalbelief of all of homo?" (57). The fact that Socrates did not publicly speakabout the gods attributed to the fact that the charge was heresy. Socratesmaintains that he is not like other philosohers. He is a free-thinker, and hisbeliefs are those of private and intimate thoughts of Gods. Socrates also statesthat he is not a teacher, yet he was not at all happy with the analogy, buttook it as a compli handst and used it in his defense. He used these bursting chargesto his expediency by saying that he never charged charged anyone for accept orlistening to them. The combination of these debates should have clearedSocrates of the charge of heresy.The atomic number 16 charge brought against Socrates was that of corrupting minors.Socrates battled this charge through the use of the same arguments. Theargument that he did not consider himself a teacher, the fact that he neveraccepted any money for talking or listening to people, and the fact that hebelieves in gods are what Socrates used to defend himself. By confronting theaccusation that he w as corrupting the minors, Socrates tried to clear himself bymanipulating his arguments so that Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon (the men whobrought both charges against Socrates) had to answer questions about thesecharges. When the questions of Socrates were placed before Meletus, his answersseemed to have prove that Socrates was innocent. However, when the verdict wasannounced, it demonstrated the opposite.Upon hearing the verdict, GUILTY, it was plain to see that the Greek host was like every other political assembly, corrupt."I should never have believed that it would be such a close thing but now